What’s Vulnerable › Vulnerabilities
CVE-2025-21664: dm thin: make get_first_thin use rcu-safe list first function
- Severity: medium (CVSS 5.5 v3.1)
- Exploited in the wild: not listed in CISA KEV
- EPSS: 0.2% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days
- Public exploit or detection template: none known
- Published: 2025-01-21 · updated 2026-10-15
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dm thin: make get_first_thin use rcu-safe list first function The documentation in rculist.h explains the absence of list_empty_rcu() and cautions programmers against relying on a list_empty() -> list_first() sequence in RCU safe code. This is because each of these functions performs its own READ_ONCE() of the list head. This can lead to a situation where the list_empty() sees a valid list entry, but the subsequent list_first() sees a different view of list head state after a modification. In the case of dm-thin, this author had a production box crash from a GP fault in the process_deferred_bios path. This function saw a valid list head in get_first_thin() but when it subsequently dereferenced that and turned it into a thin_c, it got the inside of the struct pool, since the list was now empty and referring to itself. The kernel on which this occurred printed both a warning about a refcount_t being saturated, and a UBSAN error for an out-of-bounds cpuid access in the queued spinlock, prior to the fault itself. When the resulting kdump was examined, it was possible to see another thread patiently waiting in thin_dtr's synchronize_rcu. The thin_dtr call managed to pull the thin_c out of the active thins list (and have it be the last entry in the active_thins list) at just the wrong moment which lead to this crash. Fortunately, the fix here is straight forward. Switch get_first_thin() function to use list_first_or_null_rcu() which performs just a single READ_ONCE() and returns NULL if the list is already empty. This was run against the devicemapper test suite's thin-provisioning suites for delete and suspend and no regressions were observed.
Affected products
- Linux kernel: from 3.15.1 before 5.4.290; from 5.5 before 5.10.234; from 5.11 before 5.15.177; from 5.16 before 6.1.125; from 6.2 before 6.6.72; from 6.7 before 6.12.10 — fixed in 5.10.234, 5.15.177, 5.4.290, 6.1.125, 6.12.10, 6.6.72
How to fix
Upgrade to a fixed version: Linux kernel 5.10.234, 5.15.177, 5.4.290, 6.1.125. Check the vendor advisory for mitigations.
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/12771050b6d059eea096993bf2001da9da9fddff
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6b305e98de0d225ccebfb225730a9f560d28ecb0
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/802666a40c71a23542c43a3f87e3a2d0f4e8fe45
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/80f130bfad1dab93b95683fc39b87235682b8f72
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cbd0d5ecfa390ac29c5380200147d09c381b2ac6
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/cd30a3960433ec2db94b3689752fa3c5df44d649
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/ec037fe8c0d0f6140e3d8a49c7b29cb5582160b8
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00001.html
- https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2025/03/msg00002.html
- https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-265688.html
Get alerted when CVE-2025-21664 or the next vulnerability affects your stack