What’s Vulnerable › Vulnerabilities
CVE-2026-64067: netfs: Fix missing barriers when accessing stream->subrequests locklessly
- Severity: critical (CVSS 9.8 v3.1)
- Exploited in the wild: not listed in CISA KEV
- EPSS: 0.5% probability of exploitation in the next 30 days
- Public exploit or detection template: none known
- Published: 2026-07-19 · updated 2026-10-15
- Weakness: CWE-667
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfs: Fix missing barriers when accessing stream->subrequests locklessly The list of subrequests attached to stream->subrequests is accessed without locks by netfs_collect_read_results() and netfs_collect_write_results(), and then they access subreq->flags without taking a barrier after getting the subreq pointer from the list. Relatedly, the functions that build the list don't use any sort of write barrier when constructing the list to make sure that the NETFS_SREQ_IN_PROGRESS flag is perceived to be set first if no lock is taken. Fix this by: (1) Add a new list_add_tail_release() function that uses a release barrier to set the pointer to the new member of the list. (2) Add a new list_first_entry_or_null_acquire() function that uses an acquire barrier to read the pointer to the first member in a list (or return NULL). (3) Use list_add_tail_release() when adding a subreq to ->subrequests. (4) Use list_first_entry_or_null_acquire() when initially accessing the front of the list (when an item is removed, the pointer to the new front iterm is obtained under the same lock).
Affected products
- Linux kernel: from 6.10 before 7.0.11; 7.1-rc1, 7.1-rc2, 7.1-rc3, 7.1-rc4 — fixed in 7.0.11
How to fix
Upgrade to a fixed version: Linux kernel 7.0.11. Check the vendor advisory for mitigations.
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/293a4532c36f38458e38b8879b174ab797718b9d
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/b5782e2d462c028096f922abca46318cec890670
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/f048f297d93fdb19d72d01d22f04c419d8b16602
Get alerted when CVE-2026-64067 or the next vulnerability affects your stack